Some useful reading to start the year…

The lack of postings on my blog over the past week or so is due to the fact that I’ve been away, relaxing in a remote area of the West Coast with no internet or cell phone access! A good opportunity to catch up on a bit of reading – among which are a couple of really interesting reports from the UK:

impact_ict_schools.jpg

Titled The impact of ICT in schools – a landscape review, it is just published by Becta and provides a major review of the evidence on the impact of ICT in schools. The review, carried out by researchers at the Quality in Education Centre, University of Strathclyde, looked at over 350 sources to build a ‘big picture’ of where and how ICT has had an impact across the schools sector, including:

  • Impact on teaching and learning
  • Impact on attainment
  • Personalisation of the learning experience
  • Impact on home-school links
  • Impact on administration, management and workload.

The review found that evidence of impact is inconsistent across schools, subjects and technologies. The greatest impact is found where the use of ICT is embedded in everyday classroom experience, has clear educational goals, and is seen as purposeful by pupils. Other key findings include:

  • A whole-school strategy that addresses the development and sustainability of ICT is a critical factor in the effective use of technology.
  • Teachers’ ICT skills have developed significantly over the years, as has the range of both hardware and software available in the classroom – there is evidence that these developments have led to a reduction in teachers’ workloads.
  • Use of ICT is most effective where teachers integrate a number of technologies – for example, laptops, interactive whiteboards and the internet.
  • ICT can contribute to personalising learning by putting greater control in the hands of the learner, but the challenge this presents to the traditional teacher-pupil relationship means this may not always be welcomed.

The list of findings and conclusions in the report all resonate with me in terms of the New Zealand experience. It’s always good to see what we’re doing in the context of international experience, and find that we’re all in the same ball park!

The final bullet point above, in particular, is one that we should take particular notice of as our (NZ) Minister of Education is promoting the Personalising of Learning within all areas of our education system in NZ at the moment. In my experience there’s a danger in seeing ICT as the magic bullet that may bring this about – but as the evidence suggests, while the potential for this may exist the ICT alone will not allow us to achieve a personalised approach to learning.

This brings me to the second of the readings – one that I downloaded earlier last year, but only got around to reading again in detail over the break.

FutureLab_Personlaising.jpg

The ‘Personalisation and Digital Technologies‘ report from FutureLab moves the personalisation debate forward by focusing specifically on the potential of digital technologies in four key areas:

  • enabling learners to make informed educational choices;
  • diversifying and acknowledging different forms of skills and knowledge;
  • creating diverse learning environments; and
  • developing learner-focused forms of assessment and feedback.

The body of the report provides a lot of explanation and some useful examples – a recommended read to begin the year!

2 thoughts on “Some useful reading to start the year…

  1. Hi Derek – while you were in the wilds last week I blogged my brief thoughts on this – Pete Bradshaw my ex-Ultralab colleague, provided an interesting link to a related Demos report – his blog is well worth reading – it’s tracking his pHD work into this subject.

    Like

  2. Arguably ICT is stuck! 15-20 % of schools do make effective use (teaching, learning, management), but there are huge variations both between and within schools. A big problem is that the conversation about ICT is taking place between the ???converted???, that is the same 15-20% and people and organizations like CORE who are interested in the technology. Somehow, the congregation needs to be broader:^)

    Not to mention the huge and growing gap between real life experience of technology (web2.O, Wii and all that??) and the curriculum use of technology??

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s